I think MATLAB provides something similar with their MATLAB Engine library (which allows applications to use MATLAB to do computations). I think that having FreeMat run in a server mode would be more useful than trying to build it as a stand alone library (which is where it started). Also, graphics and threads interactions are tied to the Qt4 library. Separating the FreeMat compute engine from the front end will be difficult without losing the graphics capabilities. This discussion would be better served on the WIKI, perhaps?ġ. Just needs to follow "POV Ray Integration Tutorial":Ġ. Īt least from my experience, for various integrations Netbeans seems Steps #4 and #5 are simpler to achive with Netbeans. Matlab, a Matlab grammar (if we can find one) would be a good starting Step #3 is general(IDE independent) and since Freemat is so similar to I think the biggest and most complicated step is #1. Other webapplication server plug-ins) since they start stop and These could be implemented similar to the Jetty/Tomcat (or e.g.execute *.m file, start engine, stopĮngine. Various execution targets (as a poor man's solution, this could beĭone even with an ANT file). The Eclipse wizards already do allot if there's an existing grammar. Start the eclipse language plug-in based on that grammar. In this case, to specify Eclipse (but other editors too). Freemat Editor to be configurable with an "external editor", and To have the Freemat Engine "separated" and callable from
I don't think that a QT level integration is needed, (at least not forĪ much simpler approach (and separated) could be: > framework available now (on beta status) I think the integration in But because there is a Eclipse pluging for the Qt Unfortunately, I am a hobby Java developer and have no experiences
0 kommentar(er)
